Showing posts with label Eschatology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eschatology. Show all posts

Sunday, August 13, 2023

The Binding of Satan

The Binding of Satan

In ancient times, Satan had virtually free reign on earth – always under the rule of YHWH. The accounts in Job make this latter point clear: see Job 1:6-12 and 2:1-6; Satan could go no further than God specified.

With this rule in mind, we can understand the behavior of evil people and nations in the ancient world – carnal individuals and large groups acting out in their depraved natures according to the rule of YHWH. The well-known conflict between Elijah and the prophets of Baal in 1 Kings 18 shows us how unregenerate people are influenced to follow after demonic idols. This is what happens when the Spirit of God does not restrict carnal people.

In Daniel 7 we see the beast (teeth of iron, nails of bronze, ten horns), and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them, until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for the saints to possess the kingdom. (Daniel 7:21-22) This shows that Satan was running amuck, until the Ancient of Days appeared to bind him, passing judgment on behalf of His saints

Zechariah 3:1 Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the Angel of the Lord, with Satan standing at his right side to accuse him.

Luke 4:5-6 So he took Him up and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. The Devil said to Him, “I will give You their splendor and all this authority, because it has been given over to me, and I can give it to anyone I want.

We have this in Acts 16:16, “In past generations He allowed all the nations to go their own way,”. The implication being that since Christ came and inaugurated His kingdom, the nations were not free to go their own way. What caused the change?

During Jesus’ earthly ministry, Satan was Bound.

Mark 3:26-27 (HCSB) “And if Satan rebels against himself and is divided, he cannot stand but is finished! On the other hand, no one can enter a strong man’s house and rob his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man. Then he will rob his house.

John 12:31-33 (HCSB) “”Now is the judgment of this world. Now the ruler of this world will be cast out. As for Me, if I am lifted up from the earth I will draw all people to Myself.” He said this to signify what kind of death He was about to die.

Luke 10:17-18 The Seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons submit to us in Your name.” He said to them, “I watched Satan fall from heaven like a lightning flash.

Colossians 2:15 He disarmed the rulers and authorities and disgraced them publicly; He triumphed over them by Him.

After Satan was bound, Jesus was close to His ascension.

John 14:30 I will not talk with you much longer, because the ruler of the world is coming. He has no power over Me.

1 John 5:19 We know that we are of God, and the whole world is under the sway of the evil one.

1 Corinthians 10:26 for the earth is the Lord’s, and all that is in it. (citing Psalm 24:1) Though Satan had “ownership” of the kingdom of the world, God owns everything.

Satan, the strong man, was bound; yet he prowls like a lion. Satan was bound, yet he holds the whole word under his sway. Satan was bound and can deceive many. So how was he bound?

From Hal Brunson:

How can you possibly say that Satan has been bound so as not to deceive the nations?” Only in this sense—Satan is bound so that he longer exercises unilateral dominion over the nations as God calls his elect from among the inhabitants of the world. Did not Jesus Himself prophesy that there would “arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect”? (Matt 24:24) While Satan may indeed blind the nations partially, he cannot blind them completely, for God has ordained that He should call out His redeemed people from “out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation.” (Rev 5:9) God’s will remains inexorable and immutable in this matter, and no power in earth or heaven, not even Satan’s power, can prevent the salvation of “the Israel of God.”

People who deny that Satan is currently bound are either a.) blinded by assumptions that are not supported by Scripture, or b.) unable to accept that binding a person does not necessarily mean the complete and total disabling of that person. There is coming a day when that binding will be complete, just our sanctification will be. But that day is not now. We live in the inaugurated kingdom which will be consummated upon the return of Christ. Just as His kingdom is not yet complete or total, neither is the binding of Satan. Just as His kingdom will be complete and total when He returns, so will Satan's binding.

Sunday, December 4, 2022

The Great End Time Debate

 The Great End Times Debate

A review by Stuart Brogden

It’s easy, when writing about a controversial topic, to tear down opposing views instead of explaining why you think your position is best. Dean Davis has taken the high road in his The Great End Times Debate, focusing most of his pages to explaining why amillennialism fits best with Scripture. And he pursues this course with a biblical theology perspective – not settling for simple proof-texting. This makes it more work to follow Davis’ arguments, but the result is a very comprehensive explanation of the biblical support for amillennialism.

In the Preface, Dean tells us his book is “no cakewalk. That’s because my goal here is the same as it was for the HKOH (High King of Heaven): to introduce you to every aspect of the Great End Time Debate, and to help you discern the winner once and for all.” This book is divided into six parts, with two or more chapters each. These six parts are:

1.      Introducing the Great End Time Debate

2.      Understanding the Kingdom of God

3.      Understanding Old Testament Kingdom Prophecy

4.      Understanding the Millennium

5.      Understanding the Consummation

6.      Resolving the Great End Time Debate

In part 1, our author provides an overview of what is biblical eschatology and why we need it – and to be Christ-focused therein. The Old Covenant prophets, he writes, “looked forward to the last days: the days in which God would send the Redeemer, pour out his Spirit, rescue and restore his people (Jews and Gentiles alike), roll back the curse, and bring in a whole new world order marked by justice, health, peace, prosperity, and the universal knowledge of the glory of God (Is. 2:2; Jer. 48:47; 49:39; Dan. 2:28; Hos 3:5; Mic. 4:1–2).”  We have a level of continuity as well as progressive revelation, for when, “we step onto New Testament (NT) ground, we find to our amazement that the disciples are no longer looking forward to these things, or at least not in the same way their OT forefathers did. For even now—prior to Christ’s return and the consummation of their redemption—they affirm that they are living in the last days.” (page 23) This idea of progressive revelation is critical, for many get trapped in thinking we must live under Old Covenant laws without thinking of how the Lord and His apostles instructed us to live. Davis is constant in his reminders of this truth.

Our author asks us why we read the Old Testament, what do we hope to see there? We can all read about the patriarchs and prophets, but YHWH has more for His people – we should go seeking Christ! “With the truth of Christ in your mind, and with the Spirit of Christ in your heart, you go in search of types: veiled revelations of the Lord Jesus Christ and the several elements of the Eternal Covenant. And every time you come upon one, you are thrilled. It’s like spotting gold nuggets in a mountain stream, or finding chests full of treasure buried in a field. And yet there is a note of sadness as well. For as you are walking on OT ground, it dawns on you that your OT brothers and sisters continually dwelt in a land of shadow.” (pages 56-57) These Old Testament saints responded to the light given them; much more light has been given to all who live on this side of Calvary. Are we thankful souls for God’s kindness in providing so bountifully for us? And Davis wisely counsels that “progressive revelation will require us to use the NCH (New Covenant Hermeneutic) to interpret OTKP (Old Testament Kingdom Prophecy). In particular, we must interpret it typologically and figuratively, rather than literally.” (page 60) This is critical for a proper view of eschatology – and basic understanding of the whole Bible.

In his discussion of the Old Testament’s promise of the Kingdom, Davis tells us, “In Eden we catch a glimpse of the Kingdom in seed form; in the World to Come we will behold it in full flower.” (page 67) And, “the idea of the Kingdom predates the Mosaic Law by thousands of years; that it is separable from, prior to, and more fundamental than the idea of a universal Mosaic theocracy. Yes, in the process of time God would indeed be pleased to use a Mosaic theocracy to picture the Kingdom. However, the Kingdom itself would be something other than a Mosaic theocracy. It would simply be a direct rule of God over his (redeemed) creation, with all the wholeness and blessing that such a rule entails.” Shadow must give way to substance – Scripture teaches this from cover-to-cover. A rigid literalism can trap brothers in a misguided understanding of national Israel and use of Mosaic Law in the New Covenant.

Our author reviews the Old Testament promises of the Kingdom in the lives of Noah, Abraham, and national Israel. He observes, “If the Kingdom of God were an ideal Mosaic theocracy, we could not see it in the life and times of father Abraham. But according to Christ and the apostles it is not a Mosaic theocracy. It is a direct spiritual reign of the God who calls a chosen family out of the Domain of Darkness and brings them into the Kingdom of his beloved Son. It is the Teacher alone who enables us to see this. And when we do, we rejoice, even as our father Abraham rejoiced when he saw his day (John 8:56).” Abraham is the father of all who believe on Christ Jesus (Romans 4:16); we ought to study his life and beliefs as we do the apostles.

While reviewing the New Testament on the Coming of the Kingdom, Davis shows us how the Lord Jesus “used parables to hide Kingdom truth from the hardened and impenitent, but also to excite curiosity about that truth in the hearts and minds of his sincere followers. Accordingly, when the disciples earnestly inquired about such truth, they received it in full (Matt. 13:10–16).” Wanting to know the meaning of Scripture is a sign you belong to Him; the Spirit gives wisdom to the humble soul who honestly desires to submit to YHWH. Davis posits that the Kingdom of God has two stages: “A temporary Kingdom of the Son, which is spiritual only, followed by an eternal Kingdom of the Father, which is both spiritual and physical—the two being separated by a single Consummation at the end of the present evil age.” He reminds us that “During the first stage of the Kingdom, the Messianic Son of God reigns from Heaven above, and not on the earth below.” This is a spiritual kingdom that is present in the lives of the saints during this age and will be physically perfected in the age-to-come, when the Son hands the kingdom over to the Father. Davis’ review of the parable in Luke 19 about the minas shines with the truth of God’s Word regarding the nature of the Kingdom: the nobleman (Jesus) goes to a far country (heaven) to receive a kingdom (His spiritual reign in this age). He will return after many days to reward His servants, destroy the rebels, and welcome His servants into His (glorified) kingdom. “Once again, the two-staged Kingdom of God is in view.” (page 98)

In his discussion of this general topic, Davis repeatedly asserts that Jesus offered the kingdom to various people groups. Nowhere in Scripture does any member of the Trinity offer the kingdom or salvation to anyone; everywhere the kingdom is ANNOUNCED and gospel PROCLAIMED as people are COMMANDED to repent and believe. This is not a minor point. If the gospel and the kingdom are offered to sinners, God is put in the position of "the anxious seller," hoping people will accept Him. The Bible does not give any hint of God in this light. He commands the clouds where to go and drop rain, He gives life to that which was dead, He calls into existence things that do not exist. While none of us is able to describe God comprehensively, each of us who name Christ as Lord should seek to never reduce Him in any of His attributes. God speaks and His sheep hear His voice. He needs not offer His kingdom to anyone - He gives it to whom He pleases.

The next part, Interpreting Old Testament Kingdom Prophecy (OTKP), Davis explains why it is contrary to Scripture to interpret these prophecies literally. “What premillenarians call millennial conditions, the OT prophets call eternal conditions. But since these conditions—understood literally—cannot possibly last forever, we must interpret the prophecies that speak of them typologically and figuratively, rather than literally.” (page 126) “All OTKP is “covenantally conditioned.” That is, in all these prophecies the Holy Spirit was using OT language and imagery to speak “mysteriously” about New Covenant realities.” (page 131) He goes on to rightfully tell us we must use the didactic New Covenant passages with a New Covenant Hermeneutic to determine the Author’s intended meaning, and emphatically states, “Unless we are prepared to abandon the divine inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, we must interpret OTKP typologically and figuratively, in terms of the New Covenant.” (page 133) “All OTKPs are fulfilled in the twofold spiritual reign (Kingdom) of God instituted by Christ under the New Covenant, and must be interpreted accordingly.” (page 134) This dual fulfillment eliminates the conflict Darby’s system leaves us with, providing a Christ-focused view which brings us ultimate victory rather than an earth-focused system which leaves us looking in the wrong places, in the shadows, instead of the glorious light of the Savior.

Our author goes on to expound how these OTKPs are “covenantally conditioned” and must be interpreted from that perspective and into the saints’ New Covenant status. OTKPs are fulfilled in Christ and must be interpreted as shown by Him and the apostles, of which Davis gives several examples. We also find chapters dealing with the OTKPs found in Psalms, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, and Zechariah. From these we are advised that Isaiah uses “covenantally conditioned imagery to speak “mysteriously” of both stages of the eschatological Kingdom introduced by the New Covenant in Christ. A closer look at our text abundantly vindicates his approach and helps us to see how richly Isaiah speaks to the hearts of Christians everywhere, whether Jew or Gentile.” (page 159) Also, of Ezekiel 37, the Valley of Dry Bones, we are warned against the futurist view; “By pushing this prophecy into a distant millennial future, and by limiting its fulfillment to ethnic Israel, prophetic literalism turns it into a valley of dry bones. But when the NCH breathes upon it, how the dry bones live!” (page 171) In Zechariah we are instructed that the oracles pronounced in chapters 12 – 14 are not chronologically connected but thematically connected, as the prophet pressed “snapshots of key events that will take place in the Era of Fulfillment.” (page 185) Further we see this, in reference to “the world to come”:

Happily, the NT sheds further light on this mysterious promise, teaching us that Christ himself, at his Parousia, will “diminish” (i.e., extinguish) the luminaries (Matt. 24:29; 2 Peter 3:10; Rev. 6:13); that in the World to Come the glory of God and the Lamb will illumine all things, both inwardly and outwardly (Rev. 21:11, 23; 22:5); and that this “unique” eschatological Day will stand as a perpetual testimony and reminder: The darkness of the Domain of Darkness has been dispersed forever by the Light of the World (John 8:12; 9:5; Rom. 13:12). (page 197)

Not only does this perspective encourage saints in all ages, it aligns with the progressive revelation we see in Scripture.

Davis spends two chapters reviewing Revelation 20; he presents a compelling case for seeing this as a recapitulation of redemptive history, with application and warning for all. I was disappointed he gave virtually no attention to sober arguments for dating Revelation before AD 70 – a minority position but not held exclusively by preterists. We next read through 63 pages which provide an excellent explanation of “the purpose, structure, and unity consummation” …in which, “God will fulfill his original plan for the universe, life, and man.” (page 253) The unity of the consummation also reveals that “at Christ’s return God will create new heavens and a new earth: an unshakable Kingdom that will never again be cursed or destroyed (2 Peter 3:13; Rev. 21:1). Thus, the writer to the Hebrews clearly anticipates a single cosmic Restoration of all (redeemed) things, just as the OT prophets had promised.” (page 266) There is no partial restoration for a thousand year reign on this earth – it is nothing or everything. And since Jesus promised to return and take us to where He is, we should rest on everything being restored.

Davis then reviews the Olivet Discourse, John 14:1-3, 1 Corinthians 15:50-58, 1 Thessalonians 4:13-5:10, and 2 Thessalonians 2:1-14, of which he says:

We have completed our survey of five crucial NT texts dealing with the Parousia and the Consummation. We have heard from Christ, Peter, and Paul. If we had consulted James, John, Jude, and the writer to the Hebrews we would have heard more of the same. None of them speak of a pre-tribulation Rapture. None of them speak of a future millennium. Rather, all of them consistently look for a single Momentous Event at the end of the present evil age: a single Christ-centered consummation set to occur at the Parousia of the High King of Heaven.

Our author states that one sign of the consummation will be “the conversion of the great mass of ethnic Jews” (page 305) without so much as a nod to the competing view in amillennial circles that what Paul is teaching is the conversion of a remnant of Jews in every generation just as the Gentile are converted. Jesus said the kingdom was to be taken away from national Israel and given to a people/nation bearing proper fruit (Matthew 24:43), Why would that nation still be considered more favorably than others when all ethnic differences have been torn down in Christ?

Our author finishes well, emphasizing the unity and singleness of Christ’s return, the general resurrection, the judgment, and the restoration of all things. Last of all, Jesus hands over the kingdom to His Father. Referring to 1 Corinthians 15:22-28, Davis says:

Paul’s theme in this text is the Resurrection. However, while discussing it, he is moved to survey the entire course of the Messiah’s heavenly reign. At the beginning of that reign God the Father gave his Son all authority in Heaven and on earth—and with that authority, a commission. Here Paul states that the commission was to abolish all hostile rule and authority, and to place all his enemies beneath his feet (Ps. 2; 8; 110; Matt. 28:18; Eph. 1:15–22). Elsewhere, he defines it as the heading up of all things in Christ, whether things in the heavens or things on the earth (Eph. 1:10). At the Parousia, Christ will fully fulfill this commission. Every enemy will be expelled, and all things will be headed up in and under him. The glorious Kingdom that the Father commissioned him to create will stand complete before him.

Accordingly, but one thing remains: one final act of worship, one final acknowledgment of the great trinitarian mystery that brought about Salvation History: The Son must hand the Kingdom over to the Father. The High King must give the Kingdom up to the One who gave it to him (John 17:6). In other words, the Son must now relinquish this form of his cosmic sovereignty, and freshly submit himself, his people, and his Kingdom to the Father. He must do this so that the Father may be properly glorified as the supreme Sovereign of the universe. He must do it so that the Father (together with his Son) may be all in all (Rev. 11:15). And because the Son loves the Father, he will do so gladly (John 17:1).4 This handing over of the Kingdom is “the consummation of the Consummation.”

Moreover, it is also the crowning touch upon the Blessed Hope of the saints. (page 315)

Chapter 15 is a summary review of the various end-times perspectives common among the saints. Of historic premillennialism, Davis says this system looks “for a literal fulfillment of some OTKPs in a future millennium” (pages 320), looking “for two distinct comings of Christ: one at the end of the present evil age and another at the end of the Millennium. Accordingly, they also look for two distinct resurrections, judgments, and transformations of nature. Thus, HP’s actually anticipate two separate consummations. However, in Part V of our study we saw that the DNT anticipates only one.” (page 321). Davis observes that the postmillennial view divides this present Kingdom of the Son into two stages – gospel proclamation under conflict from the world, then Satan being bound and allowing widespread success which, for some, includes wealth-building by the saints to previously known levels. “We have seen, however, that Scripture does not support this idea. Nowhere in the DNT do we find any suggestion that the Kingdom of the Son is divided into two stages, or that it includes a future Golden Era of Gospel prosperity.” (page 322) He further adds, “above all, Postmillennialism distorts the believer’s Blessed Hope, focusing it upon an illusory stage of Church history, rather than upon the true signs of the times and the Consummation at Christ’s return (Titus 2:13; 1 Peter 1:13).” (page 327)

Davis finishes this review with Dispensationalism and Preterism. Of the former, he says, “We conclude, then, that the dispensational view of the Consummation seriously departs from Scripture, robs Christ of his proper glory, and needlessly confuses the saints by breaking up the one Consummation into multiple comings, resurrections, judgments, and transformations of nature.” (page 336) I heartily agree! Our author divides Preterism into Partial and Full. In eight pages of discussion and critique of partial preterism, Davis cites no sources. Considering several of his comments, I would like to have sources as I’ve known and read many partial preterists who do not hold to much of what he attaches to them. He goes on to say full preterism is the logical outcome of the partial view. Full preterism sees all of Revelation as having been fulfilled prior to AD 70, robbing that book from its role to inform and comfort the saints in every generation. Full preterism “seeks to focus our hope on the world above rather than on the world up ahead; on the day of our death rather than on the day of the Lord’s return in glory, when he will raise the dead, judge the world in righteousness, and create the new heavens and the new earth, the eternal home of the redeemed. Beloveds, it is not a fair trade. Indeed, it’s a very bad trade, since, as we have seen, it leaves the Bride of Christ ill-equipped, unprepared, and bereft of her one true Blessed Hope.” (page 346) He also writes, “Concerning FP, I cannot help but describe it as eschatological heresy.” (page 346) On this I also heartily agree – although I would not attach “eschatological” as an adjective.

Dean sent me his book on the condition I review it. I am grateful to God for Dean’s work – though I have a few minor reservations here and there. This book is well written and provides countless Scripture references to support and explain each position he takes. I have a copy of the book this one is based on, Davis’ High King of Heaven. That one is more than twice the page count of this one and digs into several topics much deeper. I have not read all of the larger volume. All things considered, The Great End Tome Debate may just be my favorite book on eschatology. It is not polemic, and it shines with a focus on rightly glorifying the High King of Heaven. What child of God can argue with that?

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Examining Amillennialism

 Examining Amillennialism, this morning.

Was not feeling connected. I pray it's edifying in spite of me.




Sunday, February 27, 2022

Examining Postmillennialism

From this morning, examining Postmillennialism.

As I state in the opening, this is a look at what 2 well known advocates of our day have said and is not presented as a comprehensive overview.

These men are not heretics, but I do believe they are focused on the wrong things.




Sunday, February 13, 2022

Introduction to a Series on Eschatology

What is eschatology? Is it important? Any guidance in the Bible as to how we should approach it?


 

Friday, September 3, 2021

The Temple Myth

 by Stuart Brogden

Many think David was commanded by God to build a temple. What sayest Scripture? Let's look at several places where building the Temple is discussed.

2 Samuel 7:4-7 (HCSB) But that night the word of the LORD came to Nathan: “Go to My servant David and say, ‘This is what the LORD says: Are you to build a house for Me to live in? From the time I brought the Israelites out of Egypt until today I have not lived in a house; instead, I have been moving around with a tent as My dwelling. In all My journeys with all the Israelites, have I ever asked anyone among the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to shepherd My people Israel: Why havent you built Me a house of cedar?’

2 Samuel 7:11b-16 (HCSB) “‘The LORD declares to you: The LORD Himself will make a house for you. When your time comes and you rest with your fathers, I will raise up after you your descendant, who will come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He will build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be a father to him, and he will be a son to Me. When he does wrong, I will discipline him with a human rod and with blows from others. But My faithful love will never leave him as I removed it from Saul; I removed him from your way.  Your house and kingdom will endure before Me forever, and your throne will be established forever.’”

In the first passage above, YHWH asks the rhetorical question, "Why haven't you built Me a house?" The clear implication of verses 4 - 7 is that YHWH never asked for a permanent house; He had commanded the tabernacle be constructed. In verses 11-16 YHWH declares that He will make a house, not mere man. He grounds this in the promise of the Messiah, who will be a son of David; His kingdom will be forever.

Many get sidetracked by the second part of verse 14: When he does wrong, I will discipline him with a human rod and with blows from others. How could this be true of the Son? While Jesus had no sin, God made Him Who knew no sin to BE SIN for us (2 Cor 5:12); in 1 Peter 2:24 we see that Jesus bore our sins in His body. Peter also told us, He was delivered up according to God’s determined plan and foreknowledge, you used lawless people to nail Him to a cross and kill Him. For, in fact, in this city both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, assembled together against Your holy Servant Jesus, whom You anointed,  to do whatever Your hand and Your plan had predestined to take place. (Acts 2:23 and 4:27-28)

It was the Father's plan that His Son would build His house and that the Son would be punished as if He had done wrong, punished by the blows of men.

But there's more. In 1 Chronicles 22, David makes preparations to build the temple, saying in verse 5, “My son Solomon is young and inexperienced, and the house that is to be built for the LORD must be exceedingly great and famous and glorious in all the lands." Then this:

1 Chronicles 22:6-10 (HCSB) Then he summoned his son Solomon and instructed him to build a house for the LORD God of Israel. “My son,” David said to Solomon, “It was in my heart to build a house for the name of Yahweh my God, but the word of the LORD came to me: ‘You have shed much blood and waged great wars. You are not to build a house for My name because you have shed so much blood on the ground before Me.  But a son will be born to you; he will be a man of rest. I will give him rest from all his surrounding enemies, for his name will be Solomon, and I will give peace and quiet to Israel during his reign.  He is the one who will build a house for My name. He will be My son, and I will be his father. I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel forever.’

Nowhere in Scripture do we see hint of God telling David what he tells Solomon here. What we see here is a misapplication of what Nathan told David in 2 Samuel 7, with David declaring Solomon is the son promised to build the house for God, whose kingdom will never end. One thing Nathan told David that makes it impossible for Solomon to be the son is When your time comes and you rest with your fathers, I will raise up after you your descendant, who will come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. Solomon was an adult when David died - the son spoken of would come from David's lineage after David rested with his fathers in the grave.

David, a man after God's own heart, was still only a man. His fatherly affection and his heartfelt desire to build a glorious temple for the glorious God blinded him to the truth. David changed some of what Nathan had told him and David added to what Nathan had told him; and David told Solomon things that did not apply to him.

It is clear that God commanded the infant nation of Israel to build the tabernacle, using material plundered from the Egyptians (Ex 25:1-6 & Ex 12:33-35); He gave them explicit instructions for every detail of the tabernacle (Ex 25 - 28). This was because the tabernacle - not the stone temple - was patterned after the heavenly things (Heb 8:1-5). In 1 Chron 3 - 5:1 we see the details of the temple Solomon built; no record that God gave instruction to him for this building. It would appear that David and Solomon, like most Jews, had an earthly view of the kingdom and missed the glorious view of the eternal, spiritual kingdom that Abraham searched for and found, that was revealed to Isaiah.

But there's more. In 2 Chronicles 7, after Solomon has built the temple and dedicated it, YHWH consumed the sacrifices offered and His glory filled the temple. YHWH appeared to Solomon in a dream, telling him that He had chosen that place as a temple of sacrifice; that His eyes, heart, and name would be there forever (verses 1, 12, 16). YHWH then tells Solomon, As for you, if you walk before Me as your father David walked, doing everything I have commanded you, and if you keep My statutes and ordinances, I will establish your royal throne, as I promised your father David: You will never fail to have a man ruling in Israel (verses 17, 18), and However, if you turn away and abandon My statutes and My commands that I have set before you and if you go and serve other gods and worship them,  then I will uproot Israel from the soil that I gave them, and this temple that I have sanctified for My name I will banish from My presence; I will make it an object of scorn and ridicule among all the peoples (verses 19, 20).  

Please note: YHWH keeping His name in the temple forever was conditional upon Solomon keeping His statutes and commands. God condescended to honor Solomon and identify with the temple if Solomon was faithful. Solomon did not keep YHWH's statutes and commands, he did turn away and abandon them. 1 Kings 11 reveals Solomon loved many foreign women that YHWH had told him not to do (verses 1, 2); he followed other gods, was not completely devoted to YHWH, and he built high places and altars for many idols (verses 4 - 8). The LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned away from Yahweh, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice.  He had commanded him about this, so that he would not follow other gods, but Solomon did not do what the LORD had commanded. Then the LORD said to Solomon, “Since you have done this and did not keep My covenant and My statutes, which I commanded you, I will tear the kingdom away from you and give it to your servant." (verses 9 - 11)

Solomon did as national Israel had done - broken YHWH's statutes and commands. YHWH tells Solomon the kingdom will be TORN from him and given to his servant - which would be Jeroboam and ultimately Jesus. There is no natural son of David who fits the bill Nathan announced to David, who would be pleasing to the Father in all He did. When Jesus came, He said His food was to do the Father's will (John 4:34); in John 6:38 He said He came from heaven to do His Father's will. And in Matt 7:21 we read that those who do the Father's will are the ones who inherit heaven; And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day (John 6:40). Jesus said to the leaders of Israel, "See, your house has been left to you desolate." (Matt 23:38) The kingdom that will truly last forever is the kingdom Jesus was announcing throughout His earthly ministry, the kingdom which rules the New Covenant. This rule is among us as inaugurated; will be consummated when He returns to judge the nations, gather His people, and make all things new.

The temple Jesus is building is what Peter spoke of: Like newborn infants, desire the pure spiritual milk, so that you may grow by it for your salvation, since you have tasted that the Lord is good.  Coming to Him, a living stonerejected by men but chosen and valuable to God you yourselves, as living stones, are being built into a spiritual house for a holy priesthood to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 2:2-5) Paul likewise spoke: So then you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with the saints, and members of God’s household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus Himself as the cornerstone. The whole building, being put together by Him, grows into a holy sanctuary in the Lord. You also are being built together for God’s dwelling in the Spirit. (Ephesians 2:19-22) Like His kingdom, His temple is spiritual, not temporal and carnal.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Eschatology - How Should We Now Live?


Eschatology Application

These past 5 weeks we have taken a quick look at the 4 accepted systems of eschatology. I mentioned in the introduction that eschatology is not a standalone doctrine but the outworking of how we view Scripture. Our personal theology, including how that works out in our eschatology, will affect how we live and how we view the world and interpret the Word. Our main priority is to keep a proper focus on the Lord Jesus as the alpha and omega of our faith and of history. I want to emphasize again - I have no fight with brothers and sisters holding a sober-minded view of postmill or historic premill, though I think there are significant problems with those systems.

So if being this or that millennial is not the most important thing, why did we take this tour? Eschatology is not unimportant, as it is a study of a biblical doctrine. Since no system of eschatology is water tight, I've encouraged us to consider which system aligns best to Scripture, with a consistent focus on the glory of God in Christ. I am convinced that Amillennialism aligns with Scripture better than of any of the other systems. No distractions of looking to temporal things to determine how the golden age is progressing; no distractions of looking for a temporal halfway kingdom that elevate a people. In a book I recently read, the author points out that life and death are opposites; there is no third state between them. So it is with this and the age to come; there is no partially redeemed millennium between them.

This final message serves the same purpose as the conclusion of a sermon - answering the "so what?" question. In light of what we've learned, How Should We Then Live? As eschatology is the outworking of one's basis for interpreting Scripture, one's way of life is the outworking of one's theology. How we think about God and man affects how we live.

First a lesson from history. In the early years of the 20th century, dispensationalism was the hot topic in many circles. This nation's policies toward the infant nation of Israel was influenced to a large degree by dispensationalists. I read a letter from a dispensational Baptist preacher that was sent to Harry Truman, encouraging him to do all his could see to it Israel was given the land that is "theirs". This idea that the 20th century nation of Israel is the Israel of the Bible and is still owed prophetic fulfillment by God is the basis for the essential doctrine that defines dispensationalism - elevating national Israel to a place only the redeemed in Christ have, but reducing the inheritance of the saints from eternal bliss to earthly struggles under a renewed Davidic covenant. As Charles Ryrie asserted, viewing the separation between national Israel and the church as the foundation of dispensationalism, one cannot take his eyes off the ethnic group, elevating their millennium to the fulfillment of God’s redemptive purpose. Contrary to Ryrie, we are instructed to set our minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. For we have died, and our lives are hidden with Christ in God (Col 3:2).

Here's a very practical example I use often. Far too many Christians advocate "sin management" although most of would never call it that. There is very good, solid teaching about our need to mortify the sin in our lives. But if such teaching focuses only, or even mainly, on how to kill sin, we will be drawn to our sin. It is a function of our being that we are drawn to that which we focus on. While we are clearly told to mortify, or put to death, the sinful deeds of the flesh (Romans 8:13, Col 3:5) – we should never take our eyes off the Savior. If we focus on killing sin without always keeping our eyes of faith on Christ, we will be drawn to the sin we hate. This is why the proper theology is Christ-focused: He has conquered sin and death, His righteousness is ours, He intercedes for us, and He will come and take us to be with Him forever! And if we don't, we end up trying to manage our sin - for we cannot mortify the deeds of the flesh apart from a deliberate focus on the glorious blessed hope we have been given to.

In a big picture way, that's the point. As for how our eschatology has practical applications, there are several ways. How many people do you know that are terrified of John's Apocalypse? I have a friend who belongs to a mainline protestant church. He told me he has never read Revelation; said the thought of that book terrifies him. Is that the reason God gave us that book? The right view of Scripture, including Revelation, is to show how awesome God is, how faithful He is, how terrifying it is to be without the right clothes on that great and terrible day, and how wonderful it is to have the God of all creation as your personal God, redeemer, and refuge!

Dennis Johnson has written a wonderful commentary on Revelation, Triumph of the Lamb. He learned that "God gave the Apocalypse shown to John in order to bless us — to do us good, to convey His grace, to fortify our hearts. In Revelation, God promises His blessing seven times (a symbolically significant number): to those who hear and hold Revelation’s message (Rev. 1:3; 22:7), who die “in the Lord” (14:13), who stay awake and alert (16:15), who attend the Lamb’s marriage supper (19:9), who share the first resurrection (20:6), and who wash their robes in the blood of the Lamb (22:14; see 7:15). God gave the book of Revelation neither to tantalize nor to satiate our curiosity about His hidden timetable but rather to arm us for the spiritual conflict that we face every day."

Johnson provides seven helpful things to bear in mind as we ponder the wonder and glory of John's Apocalypse. There had to be 7, right? And they are very practical:

1. REVELATION HELPS CHRISTIANS SEE OUR SITUATION IN ITS TRUE PERSPECTIVE
Appearances can be deceiving. We often gauge how “the war” is going by the way things look to us today based on headlines about political and economic trends or global crises. The paradoxes in Revelation’s visions remind us that “we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor. 5:7). Christ’s cross looked like the slaughter of a helpless lamb, but it was actually the triumph of Judah’s Lion (Rev. 5:5–10). When faithful martyrs shed their blood, their foes seem to have conquered (11:7; 13:7). In fact, the martyrs are the true victors who vanquish Satan “by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death” (12:11).

2. REVELATION SHOWS OUR ENEMIES IN THEIR TRUE COLORS
Our enemy is stronger and savvier than we are: “the great dragon … that ancient serpent … the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world” (12:9). But the seed of the woman has come, conquered the Serpent, and ascended to heaven (v. 5). Satan can no longer accuse: his charges have been silenced by Christ’s sacrifice (vv. 10–11). Frustrated over his defeat at the cross, Satan vents his wrath against the church on earth (vv. 12–17). His weapons are violent persecution (the Beast), plausible deception (the False Prophet), and seductive pleasure (the harlot Babylon). The sovereign state, civil religion, and luxurious indulgences may seem to be “saviors.” Don’t be fooled: they aim to destroy. Revelation’s symbolism peels back the façade that often hides the grotesque hollowness of Satan’s counterfeits.

3. REVELATION REVEALS OUR CHAMPION IN HIS TRUE GLORY
As its title promises, this truly is “the revelation of Jesus Christ” (1:1). It unveils Jesus and fixes our hearts and hopes on Him. He is the hero of each dramatic scene. He is the Son of Man foretold in Daniel 7, luminous in divine glory, who by His resurrection seized death’s keys and now walks among His churches. He is Judah’s Lion who conquered by being slain, redeeming people from all the earth’s peoples. He is worthy of worship from every creature everywhere. He is the Captain of heaven’s armies, riding into battle against His and our enemies, defending beleaguered saints, and finally destroying the Dragon and his beasts. Our Champion lifts our weary hearts with His promise: “Surely I am coming soon.” We reply: “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” (22:20).

4. REVELATION ENABLES US TO SEE OURSELVES IN OUR TRUE BEAUTY
Jesus’ messages to the churches of Asia show that His fiery eyes (1:14; 2:18) see us accurately, commending our faithfulness but exposing our flaws (chaps. 2–3). Nevertheless, as mottled as the church’s spiritual complexion is now, our Bridegroom loves us and will not rest until He presents us to Himself “as a bride adorned for her husband” (21:2), clothed “with fine linen, bright and pure” (19:8). Revelation paints our coming wedding in such vivid colors that we long to pursue now the loveliness that will then be fully ours (1 John 3:2–3).

5. REVELATION SUMMONS US TO ENDURE AS WE SUFFER
Revelation was originally addressed to Christians who were suffering for their faith. They experienced poverty, slander, prison, and even death (2:9–10, 13). Writhing in his death throes in the aftermath of the cross, the Dragon escalates his assault against the saints until Christ returns to consummate history. Jesus does not promise a painless escape from this war of the ages. Instead, He promises His presence as the one who is “alive forevermore” (1:18). In response to that promise, we must heed the King’s call to patient endurance (1:9; 2:2–3, 10, 13, 19, 25; 3:8, 10; 13:10; 14:12).

6. REVELATION CALLS US TO STAY PURE WHEN COMPROMISE INVITES
Some of the first-century churches, like many churches in the twenty-first century, faced a subtler threat than persecution. Satan, the father of lies, tried to mislead believers through purveyors of false teaching (2:15, 20). Material comfort and compromise with the paganism of the surrounding culture also proved alluring (2:14; 3:17). Such insidious assaults on wholehearted allegiance to Christ are still with us. Against the Devil’s lies and invitations to idolize pleasure and prosperity, Revelation calls us to keep our hearts and lives pure as befits those who will be the Lamb’s white robed bride (3:4–5, 17–18; 7:9, 14; 14:4; 19:7–8; 22:14–15).

7. REVELATION ENCOURAGES US TO BEAR WITNESS AS GOD WAITS
Lest Revelation’s summons to endure and stay pure incline us to withdraw into bunkers, hiding from the dangerous and defiling world, we need to heed Revelation’s encouragement to bear witness to “the testimony of Jesus.” Our word martyr is derived from the Greek word meaning “witness” (martys, 2:13). John was on Patmos “on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus” (1:9). The church is symbolized in two witnesses who announce God’s word, sealing their testimony with their blood (11:4–12; 13:7). Christ’s witnesses suffer not in timid silence but for their bold declaration that Jesus is Lord of all. Through our testimony, God is fulfilling the vision of Revelation 7: “Behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb … and crying out with a loud voice, ‘Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne and to the Lamb!’” (7:9–10).

God gave us the book of Revelation not only to inform our minds but also to transform our lives. It gives us insight into the realities of our situation, our enemies, our Champion, and our true identity, and it calls us to patient endurance, hopeful purity, and courageous witness.

Recall how I mentioned we should pattern our eschatology after Abraham? In Hebrews 11, after describing the faith of Abel, Noah, Sarah, and Abraham, we read, (verse 13 – 16, page 2380) These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city.

Is this our perspective? Are we seeking a return to the land that these saints left? Or are we looking for and desiring a better country, a heavenly one, where our Lord dwells? The Author of life draws a line between these two countries and the people who dwell therein. Reminding the saints of the blessings and responsibilities that accompany our citizenship in heaven, we read (Heb 13:10) We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat. The altar mentioned here in Christ, the eating mentioned here is the Lord’s Supper. Those who serve the tent, the earthly tabernacle, have no right to this supper. When the kingdom was taken from national Israel and given to a nation (a people) who will bear the fruit of true repentance, that people who were known as Israel lost their standing as a people. Ethnic Jews need Christ, not a rebuilt earthly place of worship.

Do you have faith like Abraham or like John Nelson Darby?

Here are a few short passages from Scripture that I pray will help us comprehend how now to live. Nothing is more practical than clear instruction from the Lord God.

2 Cor 4:16-18 (page 2229) So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.

2 Peter 1:3-8 (page 2418) His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire. For this very reason, make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge, and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with steadfastness, and steadfastness with godliness, and godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love. For if these qualities are yours and are increasing, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Romans 8:31-36 (page 2172) What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised— who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written, “For your sake we are being killed all the day long; we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.”

1 Peter 4:12-14 (page 2412) Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ's sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.

Each of these short passages remind us of the temporary nature of this age and the eternal, immanent nature of the age to come. Knowing our standing in Christ, deliberately seeking to keep the eternal in plain site is the biblical means to our stability and usefulness while we yet have time here.

1 Peter 4:7-11 9page 2411) The end of all things is at hand; therefore be self-controlled and sober-minded for the sake of your prayers. Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins. Show hospitality to one another without grumbling. As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace: whoever speaks, as one who speaks oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength that God supplies—in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To him belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.

This ought to be on our lips, day by day – to Christ alone belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen!


Sunday, December 9, 2018

Amillennialism



Amillennialism

A reminder of a couple of things that we need to keep in mind.

1.       Every system of theology is the product of man and will have error. No one description of any system will satisfy everyone. We should look for the system that aligns best with Scripture. “does the least violence to Scripture.”

2.       Keep Christ clearly in view. The ultimate goal of all creation is the glorify God the Father and the Son. Our view of the end times should seek to keep His glory in its rightful place

This evening I will present amillennialism, but I want to make one thing clear before I get started. While I disagree with and find fault with postmillennialism and historic premillennialism, I have no fight with sober-minded brothers and sisters who hold those views. We are together for the gospel, to coin a phrase.

From our introduction, a definition and hermeneutic by Anthony Hoekema: "...amillennialists do not believe in a literal thousand-year reign which will follow the return of Christ... the millennium of Revelation 20 is not exclusively future, but is now in the process of realization." Welcome to the millennium! This hermeneutic: Progressive Parallelism in Revelation (Earth's history repeated 7 times) OR Prehistorist: interpret in terms of meaning to 1st century church-- reassurance of Christ's victory over Roman persecutors. Context determines whether literal or figurative. Interpret the Old Testament by the New Testament.

I will present the progressive parallelism view this evening as that the dominant amillennial view; it is the view I hold. The handout provides an overview of how we see these different vantage points of redemptive history revealed to us in John’s apocalypse. To help comprehend the parallel nature of this Scripture, I’ve included a comparison of the three series of judgments: bowls, trumpets, and seals. This progressive parallelism is also called recapitulation - retelling the same basic story several times.

One brother summed up this view in these concise points (I changed his first point a bit):

·         The focus of the Bible is the Lord Jesus and not national Israel.
·         God deals with individuals and not nations in the matter of eternal salvation.
·         God has always included the Gentiles in the number of His elect.
·         There are two Israel’s in Scripture, one physical and one spiritual.
·         The covenant promises in the OT have been fulfilled, forfeited, or made to Christ and His church.
·         The NT interprets the OT.

Amillennialism is sometimes referred to as "realized millennium" since it holds to a kingdom that has been inaugurated. This system holds to a two-age model, wherein we recognize the many references in Scripture to "this age" and "the age to come" (Matthew 12:32, Luke 20:34-35 and Ephesians 1:21 for example). We have our citizenship in heaven, we anxiously await the return of the Lord here on earth. When He returns, it will be that great and terrible day when He will judge the nations, gather His people, and make all things new; to live on the new earth with His people for eternity.

Since Amillennialism is not a basic hermeneutical rule (contrary to dispensationalism) the primary focus of the amillennial system is in Revelation, where the millennium is found. As I mentioned a couple weeks back, Revelation contains elements of narrative and epistle content, but is primarily an apocalyptic work, full of signs and symbols. We are told in the very first verse of this book that God made the revelation known by signifying it though His angel to John. The Greek word behind "signifying" is used in various technical fields to describe communication through signs; such as sign language used to communicate with deaf people. Since we see that this is the device YHWH has told us He used to reveal this bit of the redemptive story to our brother and partner in the tribulation, what basis would we have to interpret it "naturally" or "literally"? Further, in many of the scenes, John reported that he was in the spirit, not the flesh. If the book is symbolic by design, we should insist on clear indications that a piece of it should be taken literally, or physically rather than assume all should be.

The key element to our determining when each parallel story begins and ends is that we see the end of the age at the end of each one. As you can see with the bowl, trumpet, and seal judgements on the handout, the 7 parallel stories are not identical in their start or end points, but they have much in common, covering much of the redemption era. Rather than three series of world-ending judgments that crash down on creation one after another, we have a single series of judgments shown from slightly different angels, using different terms to communicate the same story. Each of the stories ends with a scene of the end of this age.

Considering this point, it is important to realize that the symbols in John's Apocalypse are not something we have to figure out; they are nearly all alluding to previous books of the Bible. God put in the canon all the tools necessary for us to properly interpret and understand Revelation. While the OT is not the determining filter for interpreting the New, we cannot understand the whole if we don't study the OT along with the New.

One thing popped into my head last Sunday while we were reading the creation story. In that historical narrative, we see that God created time and every bit of matter and organized it into our universe in 7 days. Paul (our Paul, not the apostle) mentioned that God did not need 7 days to do all He did, but He did so for a purpose. Throughout Scripture we see the number 7 having significant symbolic meaning of perfection; the battle of Jericho being one example. The Hebrews marched around the city 7 times on the 7th day and blew the trumpets 7 times; and the walls of that great city fell flat. Perfection. Completion. The amillennial view of the last book of the Bible sees that entire book organized around the number 7. There are 7 churches and 7 spirits before the throne of God. 3 sets of 7 judgments, and there are 7 parallel accounts of what happened since the first 7 days were recorded. I am not into numerology, but numbers are significant in all the Bible and even more so in apocalyptic literature such as John’s Apocalypse. The 7 spirits in ch 1 vs 4 represent the seven-fold ministry of the Holy Spirit, revealed in detail in ch 5:6. Since there is but one Holy Spirit, we know this number 7 is not literal, but symbolic of His perfection, completeness, and unity.

The first of these 7 settings is chapters 1 - 3, where even dispensationalists agree there is a break. This story introduces the book as a symbolic revelation and includes the timeless letters to the 7 churches and all churches. Each letter ends with an announcement of the end of the age (to the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life) and this haunting admonition from Christ - he who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.

The second setting is chapters 4 - 8.5, where the seal judgments are poured out. Dispensationalists say the church is raptured between chapters 3 and 4, because you see no church in the book from here on out. That dog just don't hunt. In one of the most gripping scenes in the whole Bible, Rev 6 reveals the grief felt by martyrs who are have died and with the Lord in heaven, because their brothers on the earth are being murdered. The word "church" isn't used, but we are aware of saints on earth - they are the church!  This story ends with the 7th seal and the golden censor and judgment on the earth, in Revelation 8:5 Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.

The third setting picks up with the trumpet judgments in 8:6 and runs through the end of chapter 11, where we see the 7th trumpet and the judgment on the earth that is almost identical to what 8:5 revealed. Revelation 11:19 Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple. There were flashes of lightning, rumblings, peals of thunder, an earthquake, and heavy hail.

Our fourth story runs from chapter 12 through chapter 14, beginning with the vision of the woman giving birth to a son while the dragon waits to devour him as soon as he is born — an obvious reference to the birth of Christ and Satan's attempts to defeat Him. The rest of the section describes the continued opposition of the dragon to the church. This section also introduces us to the two beasts who are the dragon’s helpers: the beast out of the sea and the beast out of the earth. This story ends with a lengthy description of judgment on the earth, with the harvest of the earth and the great winepress of God's wrath.

The fifth story picks up later in redemptive history, as chapter 15 begins with judgment, as the third telling of these judgments, with bowls this time, is revealed. Chapter 16 ends with Babylon the great being overthrown and made to drink the cup of the fury of God's wrath. When the 7th bowl is poured out, the angel of God cried out "It is done!" The Greek word is different from what Jesus cried out in John 19:30, when He said, "It is finished!" but the meanings of the two Greek words and the two English phrases are very similar. Also in this last scene of Rev 16 we see something shown to us in chapter 6 - islands and mountains fled from God. And the people of the world being punished by God curse Him as they go to their doom. This isn't happening a second time, it's merely being revealed to John - and us - a second time, from a slightly different perspective.

The sixth story is revealed in chapters 17 - 19, where Babylon falls - again! Over the years, many have seen the Roman Catholic Church in chapter 17. That cult is the city on 7 hills, she was drunk on the blood of the saints as she murdered untold numbers of Christians in the Inquisition. Most believe it to be a description of all false religion, waging war on the people of God. They make war on the Lamb and the Lamb will conquer them! Chapter 18 retells, in detail, the fall of Babylon - this is third time we've been told Babylon has fallen. Things continue to be repeated in John's account. Chapter 19 begins with a celebration of God's judgment on the rebels, celebrates the marriage supper of the Lamb, and ends with victory of the Lord Jesus over the people of the world. This is the great supper of God, where the birds of prey feast on the flesh of His enemies and the false prophet and his beast where thrown into the lake of fire.

The seventh and last story is chapters 20 - 22. In chapter 20 we see this present age, with Satan restricted from having complete dominion over the nations, the gospel having the freedom to go to the four corners of the world, saints reigning in heaven with the Lord, the brief release of Satan to deceive the nations and wage war against God - again! The Lamb wins, judges the people of the world and HIs enemies enter into the second death, never-ending punishment. The last 2 chapters reveal the glory of what is to come. As the graph I handed out shows, these chapters extend further than any other. The new earth, where righteousness dwells! The Apocalypse wraps up with the promised return of Jesus being held out to us, giving hope to every generation of saints, that we would not grow weary in well doing. And we see that the bliss of being with the Lord in New Jerusalem is not dependent on being ignorant of God's judgment on His enemies. They are described as "outside the city gate." We have the warning about adding to or taking away from this book and the promise that, surely, Jesus is coming soon! Every generation of Christians has had reason to believe His time is nigh. We are to be eagerly awaiting the return of our Lord and God, not sleep-walking through life.

This scheme is not without difficulty. Chapter 6 appears to end with the return of Christ, with chapter 7 opening with a new vision. We see continuity, however, with the seal judgments, which are unveiled beginning in ch 6:1 and ending with the 7th seal in ch 8:5. Having some of the seals in one story and the last seal in another telling of that story is more difficult to explain and accept than a story line that has judgment, a brief look at the victory of the saints, then the last seal and the end of time. Also, the binding of Satan is something that take much thought to comprehend how Rev 20:1-3 can be true when we also read he roams like a lion. Recall that even humans can have dominating influence while not present, through agents and prior contact. Much more the prince of demons!

In addition to this scheme of how we read John's Apocalypse, what else distinguishes Amillennialism? Revelation is not a book of terror, as some people imagine it. Revelation is a glorious message of Christ Jesus' victory over sin, death, and Satan and His promise to redeem and live among His people. Is that not a summary of the entire Bible? Having a right view of the Bible as a whole helps us have a right view of specific passages within it. This will be the main point of our final message on eschatology, next week.

Hand-in-glove with this view of Revelation, then, is a hermeneutic that seeks to keep the gospel message front and center in all of Scripture. Spurgeon told a story of an elderly Scottish preacher who was attending the first service of a young preacher. When the young man had finished, he sought out the older gentleman to ask him what he thought of the sermon. The old man looked the young man in the eye and said, “Not much.” “What was the problem with the message?” the young man asked. “There was no Jesus in your message, young man!” “But sir,” he replied, “there was no mention of Jesus of the text!” The elder preacher leaned in close and told him, “Son, there’s a saying that in England all roads lead to London. Not all of them go straight there, but they all lead there. Every sermon must lead your people to the cross. It may not be a direct route as in the gospel accounts, but even if you have to take them over the hedges and through the swamps, you must take your people to Christ!”

National Israel is not the focus of God's redemptive plan, Christ Jesus is. The Law of Moses is not the focus of God's redemptive plan, neither is the politics of this grand land. Anything we put in the way or place of Jesus can be a stumbling block to those being called and to those who are in Christ. So, as did Paul, we seek to preach Christ and Him crucified and not any ethnic group, political movement, or law. Here are some examples of how this works out on topics relevant to this series.

Paul uses the word mystery many times his letters, addressing several topics. One of the most controversial topics is the mystery that was then being made clear - that God had intended from the beginning to include Gentiles in His kingdom. His letter to the Ephesians is a wealth of insight into the glorious redemptive purposes of God. Ephesians 3:6 This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel. If we understand the nature of being members of the same body we would not accept those who say any ethnic group has special standing before God. In this epistle, the apostle uses three metaphors to describe what God is doing among people who were, by nature, children of wrath. Hal Brunson summed it up - "As the architect is one with his building, as the body is one with its members (Eph 4 & 5), and as the husband is one with his bride (Eph 5), so also God sovereignly joins Himself to His elect people as the head (Col 1:18) and husband (Eph 5:25)." The building metaphor is most substantial, with Paul using several architectural terms - wall, partition, household, foundation, corner stone, framed, temple, habitation, and building - all found in Eph 2:14-22. This aligns with James' description of the elect as the tabernacle of David (Acts 15:16) and Peter's spiritual stones (1 Peter 2:5). Paul says Gentiles were once alienated from the commonwealth of Israel but have been brought near by the blood of Christ and are, therefore, members of the household of God. Jew and Gentile saints are one new man and one body (Eph 2:15-16) by this reconciliation that is found in Christ. This mystery is unveiled: Christ Jesus has broken down the middle wall of partition that stood between Jew and Gentile. Note how strange it was throughout the gospels for Jesus to speak and eat with those who alienated from the commonwealth of Israel. The Jews' literal hermeneutic could not accept the fact that YHWH had promised Himself to anyone other than physical Israel. But that was the purpose and the promise of God from the beginning.

Another way Scripture helps us understand what God is doing is to see the contrast between physical Israel, Jews, and Jerusalem. While those with a strict literal hermeneutic claim Israel always and only means physical Israel, the Bible says otherwise. Hal Brunson's book, Who is Israel/ What is a Jew? Where is Jerusalem?, is a wonderfully written, well organized, compelling look at these questions.

Galatians gives us one the clearest contrasts between physical and spiritual Israel and Jerusalem. Gal 4:21-5:1 (page 2253). Paul uses Sarah as a metaphor for both unbelieving Israel and those in those in the New Covenant. As Israel, she was barren and desolate, bearing only the child that God had promised and provided. As the heavenly Jerusalem of the New Covenant, only those the Father gives to the Son, enemies of God ransomed by the blood of the Lamb, are included. Hagar is now brought in to represent national Israel, in bondage under the Law of Moses. Earthly Jerusalem, national Israel, contrasted with heavenly Jerusalem and her children, Abraham's seed according to the promise - the Israel of God (Gal 6:16).

The term, Jerusalem, shows up 142 times in the New Testament. 137 of these are references to the physical city, regarding something that took place in the first century. In each of the remaining 5 uses of Jerusalem, the writers spiritualize it to indicate the present, spiritual, heavenly, eternal nature of God's kingdom, not a future, physical, earthly instance of God's temporal kingdom. Brunson: "Paul asserts that God has rejected earthly Jerusalem and national Israel, as Hagar was the physical mother of Ishmael the rejected seed." Abraham and the other saints of old sought a heavenly city, not an earthly one, a better country and a heavenly Jerusalem. Why would anyone teach that God's purpose in glorifying His name would be tied to return the shadow kingdom, version 2?

As for the contrast between physical and spiritual Jews, the biblical witness is manifold. Romans 2:28-29 For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God. Romans 9:6-7 For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. Brunson observed that those who haggle over physical Israel still being the apple of God's eye might be just like Hagar, if she had argued with Abraham that her son had a biological claim on his blessing. But in Isaac shall the world be blessed, and the child of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman. Paul said it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring (Rom 9:8). To sum up, those who insist on keeping ethnic Jewish believers separate in identify from Gentile believers don't read Paul closely. The apostle asserts Gentiles are the true Jews (Rom 2:29), the true circumcision (Phil 3:3), Abraham's seed (Gal 3:29), fellow citizens (Eph 2:19) of the commonwealth of Israel (Eph 2:12) and children of promise (Gal 4:28) born of the same mother - Jerusalem which is above (Gal 4:26) and the Israel of God (Gal 6:16). 

Another distinctive of Amillennialism is the tension of living in this age where sin and death are present yet we have been raised up to new life in Christ. As Jesus taught (Mark 1:15),, His kingdom was among His people even while He lived on the earth. He promised to be with us until the end of the age (Matt 28:20) and He reigns even now (Eph 1:21-22, 1 Cor 15:25), not waiting for a future earthly circumstance. We are taught to live godly lives in this present age as we wait for our blessed hope (Tit 2:12-13), to not be conformed to this world (Rom 12:2), nor be devoted to it (1 John 2:15-17), and not put our hope in things of this age, such as wealth (1 Tim 6:17). And this: Beloved, we are God’s children now; it does not yet appear what we shall be (1 John 3:2). This is the "already but not yet" character of the kingdom of God.

We who are in Christ have our identity in Christ, we are seated with Him in the heavenlies, He lives in us by HIs Spirit, and we eagerly await His return, knowing He is the faithful one who come back and take us to be with Himself. Between this age and the next comes His return, which means the judgment of all flesh, the gathering of the elect, and the resurrection of the world. Jesus described this as a parable in Matthew 13 and explained it to His disciples (verses 36-43, page 1849).

The age-to-come is characterized by the continued reign of Christ (Eph 1:21-22), the kingdom will be consummated (Rev 22), we will be united with glorified bodies (1 Cor 15:53), and this: Revelation 21:3-4 “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.” This is the age-to-come. It's not the same as this present age, nor is it an improved earth.

In light of all this, how should we live? The practical aspects of one's view of the end times is more substantial and more subtle than most of us think. We will, Lord willing, examine this next Sunday as we wrap up this series on eschatology. For now, let us learn from God what the long and short of it is.

2 Peter 3:11-13 (page 2423).  May God give us grace to live as honorable servants in this wicked age.